The question you asked: Do you think that the patterns will be the same if you change the initial size of you triangle?
If I change the initial size of the triangle I think the patterns will be the same because there is no change of the angles, the triangles just become smaller.
My question: If you know the angles of a right triangle, can you predict the lengths of the triangle?
I think this question is pretty hard but I am determined to find the best possible answer. Well I don't think you can find the lengths with a good assumption because there is no information on the lengths. Here is some data on my question.
Side A 17, Side B 18, Side C 24.76.
There is a difference of the sides by 1, and the angles of the two sides have to equal to 90 degrees so an assumption would be 46 and 44 degrees, and the other would be 90 degrees because its a right angle. That is how you find an assumption of the 3 lengths of a right angle.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Okay, this is an interesting hypothesis, how will you test it? Can you collect a bunch of data to show whether your hypothesis works in several different cases? So far it seems like you have a lot of ideas and hypotheses, but not a lot of actual data that you can use to show whether they are correct. Adding some more data to your blog (perhaps in table form) would make a stronger investigation.
ReplyDeleteI think that you used assumption a lot of times and that you should use more than 1 example so that the reader can try to find that pattern you're trying to show themselves. Also, try to explain your hypothesis a little better/more.
ReplyDeleteWhy dont you do a graph of your data? it would be alot easier to follow what you are saying in a graph. What have you found since you posted this blog?
ReplyDeleteI agree on what you said about the triangle just shrinking and and the angles stay the same
ReplyDelete- GOOD JOB BRO!!!!!!!!!!-